Applicants challenged a Department of Development and Environmental Services order declaring the use of the property at issue here was not compliant with King County zoning ordinances. The assertion was that the use was established before the ordinances were revised and characterized as non-conforming. The hearing examiner found for the landowner (and county) on all relevant issues, but the superior court reversed. The appellate court reversed the superior court, and the Supreme Court reversed the appellate court. The Supreme Court held that the landowner’s use was not established within the meaning of the county code.
King County Dep’t of Dev. & Envtl. Servs. v. King County
June 28, 2013 by Leave a Comment
Speak Your Mind
You must be logged in to post a comment.